We reported earlier that there was a "complaint" filed by the Executive Director of the Medical Board of California, and a decision has now been made: As of October 24, 2012, william hamilton ayres' medical license will be revoked, and he has been ordered to surrender said license, and return his shingle and pocket "I'm a doctor" card. (Note that ayres did not renew his license after 2008.)
The good: If anyone refers to "doctor" ayres, you can now feel free to correct them disdainfully, and you should always make it a point to do so -- "What has gone so horribly awry with the neurons firing off in that pinhead of yours, that you insist on calling child molesting liar ayres a doctor?" will do nicely in a pinch.
The not-so-good: The timing of this is more than just a little bit suspicious. Here is some language from the Surrender and Revocation Decision (Note that the "Respondent" is the child molester ayres, and his "Counsel" is Shyster McDougall):
"Respondent has carefully read, fully discussed with counsel, and understands the charges and allegations [...]"
"Respondent is fully aware of his legal rights in this matter, including the right to a hearing on the charges[...] the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him[...]"
"Respondent voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waives and gives up each and every right set forth above."
Culpability: Respondent admits the truth of each and every charge and allegation in Accusation No. 03-2007-182894, agrees that cause exists for discipline under section 822 of the Business and Professions Code[...]
You might look at the accusation number and assume that because of the "2007" date that this accusation was based on the criminal charges brought against him, and that he was admitting to molesting young boys. Unfortunately this is not so: Section 822, which ayres is "admitting truthfully" relates to dementia:
If a licensing agency determines that its licentiate's ability to practice his or her profession safely is impared because the licentiate is mentally ill, or physically ill affecting competency, the licensing agency may take action[...]
How convenient that only days before child molester ayres is to appear before judge Grandsaert to contest Napa State Hospital's finding that not only is ayres NOT suffering dementia, but that he has been lying to doctors and the court about dementia to avoid prosecution, he will have had his licensed revoked by the State of California for dementia. AND the record will show that he (with the blessing of his Conservator, daughter Barbara Ayres, and his Shyster attorney) surrendered his license without contest - no doubt at the advice of his attorney. There seems to be no end to the games that the Shyster is willing to play to manipulate the courts.
Surely the timing is no coincidence.
Original Medical Board of California documents. (Our pdf copy)
By the way: Where the fuck is the God Damned press? I guess Wagstaffe didn't prepare a brief for them in the matter, so it's not news...
I'd like to offer a perspective here. i have no reason to like or have respect for the Ca, Medical Board. In fact I have every reason to regard them as criminals.
ReplyDeleteThat said this can be seen as them using the excuse of ayers assertion of demientia to take away his license as apublic service or to protect themselves due to publicity this blog has brought to the case, while being fully aware of the diagnosis of malingeirng at Napa.
ayers lawyer may use this to try to maneuver with the DA a deal of sorts. I'd say that someone from the public advocates side might stand up and say hey the Med Board has taken away his licens based on his assertion of dementia out of an abundance of caution and legal protection not because they actually believe he has dementia. There is that Napa diagnosis after 6 mos observation by multiple trained medical observers, of malingering to counter it after all.
C
In the whole, I'd agree with you exactly...
DeleteBut I would also not be surprised to hear that ayres' attorney picked at and cajoled the medical board to come to a decision quickly, in order to take advantage of their caution ahead of the trial.
"Respondent has carefully read, fully discussed with counsel, and understands the charges and allegations [...]"
ReplyDelete"Respondent is fully aware of his legal rights in this matter, including the right to a hearing on the charges[...] the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him[...]"
"Respondent voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waives and gives up each and every right set forth above."
Chester the Molester was supposedly diagnosed as having dementia at least two years ago. If he really had dementia then, today he would have Alzheimer's disease (AD).
If Chester has AD, he would not be able to carefully read, fully discussed with counsel, and understand the charges and allegations that he has diddled countless children over the course of countless decades OR to voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive and give up any of his rights.
By signing the above-mentioned document, Chester has admitted that he does not have dementia or Alzheimer's disease. As such, he is fully competent to be tried for multiple child molestation and rape.
Those were my feelings as well, but that won't fly in court, probably, because the child molester's daughter Barbara is his conservator, and has signed the document as well. Actually I think it's odd that he'd have to sign the document at all, as I think that since he's under his daughter's conservatorship, his signature means jack squat.
DeleteChester doesn't need to have a conservator; he is fully mentally competent and can take care of his physical, financial, legal, and other personal needs.
ReplyDeleteWould be fun to see if Chester's daughter would object to leaving Chester alone in a locked room with minor-aged males and to be held legally responsible should he molest or rape them.
Strangely enough, I think Jerry Sandusky's judge apparently allowed him to have unrestricted access to his minor-aged grandchildren circa last December or January - over the objection of his former daughter-in-law. Now, why on earth would she object?
Yep... we all know that he's actually fully competent, but he DOES have a conservator now, and it doesn't matter if it's because he's claiming to be a drooling idiot, or if it's just because he like to have his daughter wipe his ass for him: legally, his signature is worthless now!
DeleteHolding Barbara responsible for all of his actions now is a very interesting twist.... isn't it...