William Lynch: Victim on Trial

William Lynch to Testify TODAY June 29, 2012:

According to William Lynch's facebook page, he'll be testifying in his own defense TODAY, June 29, 2012 at the courtroom at the Hall of Justice 190 W. Hedding St., San Jose, CA.

If you're in the area, and have time, show up to support him! 

Santa Clara County and Judge Cena are in the process of railroading Lynch, and denying him his civil right to examine the prosecution's main witness against him. He is on trial for standing up to the evil subhuman (a Jesuit "Priest" named "Father Jerold Lindner")  who violently sexually abused Lynch and his brother (not to mention the other multitudes)  when he was a very young boy (7, and his brother was 4.)

The jury is going to have to correct the appallingly errant State in this matter. The State doesn't seem to care that the People would like to be protected from child sexual predators, and that they need to PASS and ENFORCE reasonable legislation, taking into account what is well documented by the APA and other psychiatric organizations about how long it takes before adults are psychologically ready to report their childhood sexual abuse.

Let's hope the jury is wise, and acquits this defendant, nullifying the horrid abuse being perpetrated by the State in this case.

William Lynch Defense Fund

I wrote earlier today about the William Lynch case. (See the post below this one.)
When Lynch was a child, he was brutally sexually attacked by "Father" Jerold Lindner. As an adult, Lynch allegedly beat Lindner up and told him that he needed to confess his evil actions. The Santa Clara DA is throwing the book at Lynch, and the judge in the case is not affording him with the leeway normally granted to molesters themselves when they are on trial.

Lynch has set up a defense fund. Please go look at it, and consider donating:


http://www.williamlynchdefensefund.com/donate.html

Thanks for your attention in this matter.

The Lady, or the Tiger?

Mercury News . (LiPo Ching/Staff) ( LiPo Ching )

Victim William Lynch Case:

In case you haven't been following the news, One of the apparently many children that "Father" Jerold Lindner molested, grew up, and after much frustration with being unable to prosecute or otherwise get the evil molester Lindner off the streets through legal means, allegedly went and socked Lindner in the face. Santa Clara county is in the process of throwing the book at William Lynch for his efforts. The Mercury News has an ongoing series of articles about the case, and has published a video interview with him as well.

The situation as it currently stands is surrealistically warped and shocking. The prosecution put Lindner on the stand to testify against the man that he molested as a boy; the prosecution told the jury that  Lindner would probably lie: they knew he would lie; they told the jury that  Lindner IS guilty of those crimes (millions have been paid to a bunch of  Lindner victims) and then, when he lied, and the defense called for a mistrial because the witness against Lynch perjured himself, the judge allowed  Lindner to execute his fifth amendment rights, and in so doing denied the defense the right to face his accuser AFTER his accuser was allowed to make his accusations in front of the jury. Judge Cena instructed the jury to ignore  Lindner's damaging testimony, but clearly it's too late... who REALLY can un-hear what they already heard? For this reason alone, mistrial should be declared.

Cena is hearing none of that.

The prosecution and the judge are clearly railroading Lynch because they are embarrassed by his attempt to do the job that the State of California appears to be unable AND unwilling to do: use reasonable methods to remove child molesters from the community.

It is absolutely disgusting that we are expected to suspend our emotions and our reason when these evil molesters are on trial. We have to listen to details about medical conditions and psychological damage that may have caused these poor, misguided people to molest children. We have to hear stories about how their health is deteriorating, and so they can't possibly be treated like a common criminal... their health would suffer! We have to listen to how hurt their families and supporters would be if there were a conviction, We don't get to see evidence that would make it seem like we're ganging up on them, we limit the number of OTHER victims of exactly the same abuses that can testify. We even prevent anyone from telling the jury HOW MANY other victims there are because it might paint an "unfair" picture.

But when someone like Lynch comes along, they end up with judges like Cena, and prosecutors like Gemetti. The jury is prevented from hearing testimony about how child sexual abuse can affect an adult's behavior ESPECIALLY when issues involving justice are concerned. The jury doesn't get to hear from other victims of the child molester to corroborate THE TRUTH.  In this case, the jury even got to hear Lindner's testimony against Lynch, but then the judge denied Lynch his right to face that accuser. To make matters worse, the judge refuses to allow for the fact that Lindner is guilty EVEN THOUGH the prosecutor stated that he was guilty, there have been millions paid out to victims of Lindner, and his own family members have stated that he molested them. Cena is removing all of the very kinds of defense tactics that ACTUAL bad guys usually use in their own defense. 

The jury trial was never meant to be a vacuum -- free from reality -- REASONABLE doubt, and heard by a REASONABLE jury. It was meant to expose the facts of a case, and to let reasonable people decide what could be tolerated in society or not.  People will tolerate vigilantism if there is no one else who is willing to step in and do what is right for the community, and this makes the State VERY afraid especially when they can not, or are loathe to, prosecute bad people.

All reason, all logic, all justice, all humanity has left the justice system.

The purpose of the justice system is to prevent State officials from being publicly exposed and embarrassed about doing their jobs poorly, and nothing more.

The Fox is running the hen-house.

Lynch has a Legal Defense Fund facebook page set up. Go have a look there too. 

You can donate to his defense fund here:
http://www.williamlynchdefensefund.com/donate.html

San Mateo County: Come have sex with our children!

San Mateo County: Come have sex with our children!
The Scott Del Marshal McKibbin Issue:

On Friday, June 8, 2012, Scott Dell Marshal McKibbin was sentenced to only three years of prison time for molesting a young boy. Prior to the sentencing he was out on only $50,000 bail.

According to an article in the Mercury News on April 5, 2012 [pdf], McKibbin was originally charged with six counts of oral sex with a minor and three of luring or arranging for the 16 year old boy to travel to have sex with him. McKibbin met the boy online, help him get a passport, and taught him how to skirt the rules about flying without an adult. He bought the young boy a ticket to fly from Vancouver, Canada to the US for the purposes of sex. 

McKibbin was arrested when the boy's parents discovered his emails to McKibbin after they realized that their child was missing. The police caught McKibbin at the airport where he went with the boy to make arrangements to delay the boy's scheduled return flight. 


McKibbin was not required to register as a sex offender for this case because he's ALREADY registered as a sex offender in California -- he doesn't appear on the Megan's Law list though. He was previously convicted after he gave a 14 year old boy alcohol and had oral sex with him.

According to the Mercury News, McKibbin's defense attorney says that "McKibbin and his family have suffered greatly because of the case..." Hey, here's a tip to avoid suffering in the future, McKibbin: STOP MOLESTING YOUNG BOYS.  These guys and their attorneys are really nothing more than the scrapings at the bottom of the crap barrel.

Here's the kicker though:

McKibbin is only sentenced to three years because deputy district attorney Melissa McKowan made a deal with McKibbin, and dropped all charges except for ONE plea of NO CONTEST on ONE oral copulation charge. I'm guessing three years translates to about a year and a half time served if we're all lucky (and we probably won't be lucky.)

According to the San Mateo Daily Journal [pdf], District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe "called the outcome 'reasonable' for the case."


I don't know what the problem is with people in San Mateo County. The reasons given for the light plea deal are that the boy knew he was traveling for sex.... so I guess that makes it harder to get a conviction. I don't know if this is because the District Attorney of San Mateo THINKS the public is really that stupid, or if it because the people of San Mateo County really ARE THAT stupid.

The Judges in San Mateo County appear to be equally willing to play along with a "just look away" policy when young people are being sexually abused in the county.

I have no idea what the victim and his family might be thinking at this point, but I'm guessing that there must be a grave disappointment in the People of San Mateo County for continuing to allow this nonsense with our District Attorney and Judges.

As Attorney Robert Allard said to the Palo Alto Daily Post (not published online) in April of 2012 [pdf]: "It's open season for pedophiles" in San Mateo County.

It's well past time to start voting these people out, folks.

Unless, of course, you're a child molester. In that case, come to San Mateo County and have sex with our children -- we go easy on you here.

Updates: ayres’ Civil Lawsuits and Probate Cases

Some updates to the Civil lawsuits against william ayres relating to his molestation of young boys, as well as to the probate case in which ayres’ daughter Barbara Ayres has been appointed as conservator of the child molester:

In the civil lawsuits:
All five known individual lawsuits against ayres were on hold pending outcome of any criminal re-trial. Since that effort was stalled by ayres’ dementia gambit, in three of the five cases, the attorney was told to file a motion to lift the stay so that the cases can proceed to trial.  The motion to lift the stay has been granted by Judge Freeman, and trial dates are now scheduled to proceed against the child molester.

There is a case management hearing scheduled for July 3, 2012 at 9am in all three matters, and trials are scheduled for April 8, 2013,  April 22, 2013, and May 20, 2013.

The order in itself is interesting, and reads as follows (I’ve replaced the first names of the plaintiffs with “XXXX” as the order is the same for all three plaintiffs. Defendant “John Doe 1” is william ayres – also note that witnesses have already “become unavailable”):

HEARING: MOTION RE: TO LIFT STAY AND SET CASE FOR TRIAL FILED BY XXXX DOE
06/05/2012 - 9:00 AM DEPT. PJLM

Honorable Beth Labson Freeman, judge presiding.
Attorney(s): John P. Carcione appearing for plaintiff XXXX Doe.
Attorney(s): Constance I. Yu appearing via courtcall for defendant John Doe 1.
Courts tentative ruling instructed parties to appear.

Court indicated it is inclined to set this matter for trial regardless of whether the five year statute will expire this fall.


Court  indicated plaintiff is entitled to a trial before memories fade and witnesses become unavailable.

Court instructed counsel to be prepared to select a trial date at this hearing.  Matter argued by counsel and submitted to the court.

Having considered the submitted matter, the court rules as follows:

The court finds no authority to grant a stay in a civil action based on a defendant having been found not competent to stand trial in a criminal action. A defendant in a civil action not competent to stand trial may have a guardian ad litem/conservator appointed.

The court is not persuaded that waiting for the related criminal action to resolve would assist  this civil action.

Court lifts the stay in this case.  Court sets this case for jury trial on april 22nd, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in the presiding judges  department.

Time estimate for trial = 3 weeks.

In the matter of Barbara Ayres becoming conservator of the child molester:
the  “Order Appointing Probate Conservator” [pdf] form has been submitted to the court.

It indicates that:

➲ ayres is “unable to properly provide for his personal needs for physical health, food, clothing, or shelter” and that he “has dementia as defined in Probate Code section 2356.5”

➲ No bond is required.

➲ A “nonappearance” hearing is set for August 31, 2012, at which point paperwork will be provided for the “Level of Care Determination General Plan” and a “Determination of Conservatee’s Appropriate Level of Care.”

Frankly, all of this is specious, as it should be clear to ALL that ayres is not, in fact demented, and is simply using the legal system just as he uses everyone around him, and his dementia gambit is paying off, in spite of the fact that EVERYONE knows that ayres is competent including the prosecution, the judges, and the attorney for the the child molester.

william hamilton ayres, the former president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (an organization which is obviously a complete sham) was tried on charges relating to his molestation of many young boys. The trial ended in mistrial due to a hung jury (ONE juror refused to find guilty on any charge.) 

ayres molested many young boys over the course of his career, in which he alleges to have been a psychiatrist. He has been accused of using that practice to gain easy access to young boys from both his private practice, and from the juvenile justice system. ayres was contracted to evaluate young children sent to him by judges in the juvenile system: ayres was the LOW BIDDER on these contracts according to one of the judges in the juvenile system, ensuring the coward a steady stream of boys who were not likely to be believed if they DID ever decide to report. 

Barbara Ayres: Conservator of accused child molester william hamilton ayres

Conservatorship: GRANTED

According to the county court minutes, Barbara Ayres has been granted medical conservatorship of the child molester william hamilton ayres. Note that the court record also shows that Barbara is conservator of the ESTATE as well. This was not in the original paperwork or discussion. I'm not sure if this is an error, or if in this case "estate" refers to just his medical upkeep.

Note that there were some updates later in the afternoon:
Barbara is the conservator of the child molester and his estate.
Exclusive medical authority still lies with the child molester himself, and request for dementia authority for secured facility placement and medication authority is DENIED.

I'm not totally clear about what all of this means, except to say that it sounds like the molester will essentially be allowed to make whatever decisions he wants to make about whether or not he is treated for the dementia that he is alleging to have, and which is keeping him from being re-tried for his heinous, perverted crimes against humanity. It makes sense that he desperately does not want to be forced to take medication which he doesn't need, and which, if taken could be used, in part, to establish his  "restoration" to capacity.

william hamilton ayres, the former president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (an organization which is obviously a complete sham) was tried on charges relating to his molestation of many young boys. The trial ended in mistrial due to a hung jury (ONE juror refused to find guilty on any charge.) ayres was slated to be re-tried, but his attorney is in the midst of an "incompetent to assist in his own defense" gambit. ayres molested many young boys over the course of his career, in which he alleges to have been a psychiatrist. He has been accused of using that practice to gain easy access to young boys from both his private practice, and from the juvenile justice system. ayres was contracted to evaluate young children sent to him by judges in the juvenile system: ayres was the LOW BIDDER on these contracts according to one of the judges in the juvenile system, ensuring the coward a steady stream of boys who were not likely to be believed if they DID ever decide to report, even knowing the severe (and often frightening) legal and peer problems that reporting could cause them.

HEARING: APPOINTMENT OF CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON
06/01/2012 - 9:00 AM DEPT. 28

HONORABLE GEORGE A. MIRAM, JUDGE PRESIDING. CLERK: ANN SIEVERT COURT REPORTER: LORNA TRAUBE

ATTORNEY(S): ROBERT J. BRADY APPEARED WITH AND ON BEHALF OF BARBARA AYRES

THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PETITION.

THE COURT GRANTS THE PETITION FOR CONSERVATORSHIP AS THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVE.
PETITION GRANTED.

BARBARA AYRES IS APPOINTED CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF WILLIAM AYRES.

EXCLUSIVE MEDICAL AUTHORITY TO REMAIN WITH THE CONSERVATEE.

THE REQUEST FOR DEMENTIA AUTHORITY AS TO SECURED-PERIMETER PLACEMENT AND DEMENTIA MEDICATIONS IS DENIED AT THIS TIME.

A NONAPPEARANCE HEARING TO BE SET FOR 8/31/12.

THE CONSERVATOR TO ATTEND CONSERVATOR EDUCATION CLASSES WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF APPOINTMENT.
PROOF OF COMPLETION TO BE FILED WITH THE COURT.

PURSUANT TO PROBATE CODE SECTION 1851.5, THE COURTORDERS PAYMENT OF $850.00 FROM THE ESTATE TO THE SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT, WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS.

FORMAL ORDER SUBMITTED AND SIGNED BY THE COURT.
ENTERED BY ASIEVERT ON 06/01/12.