The petition states:
William Ayres is diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Without the assistance of others he is unable personally to provide for his daily needs as a result of the increasingly debilitating effects of the dementia, especially in the exposure to risk of self injury from falling and in failing to manage his medication regimen accurately. Failing memory also prevents him from managing his other health care needs without the assistance of others.
A total of six court investigators have been authorized to access Ayres' health information. For the record, Barbara Ayres did not attend her father's criminal trial in the summer of 2009.
Update: 3/16/ 12: 1:25 pm.
Interesting information found at this entry:
| 03/07/2012 | DECLARATION OF ATTORNEY FOR PROPOSED CONSERVATEE FILED BY WILLIAM AYRES |
According to his lawyer Jonathan McDougall's statement, "Mr" (sic) Ayres is being given:
1) Citalopram for depression and anxiety
2) Levothyroxine for hypothyroidism
3) Memantine for cognitive deficits
4) Omega-3 fatty acid for cardio and cerebrovascular protectionprotection (sic)
5) Methocarbamol for chronic pain.
McDougall describes "Mr." Ayres' demeanor at two meetings at his law office on April 2, 2011 and at a visitor's room at Napa State hospital on March 1, 2012 as "pleasant and cooperative." He states that Ayres "expressed concern over placing a burden on his daughter. He felt that she possessed the knowledge and skills needed to do a great job but did not want to burden her with responsibilities. "
MacDougall then states:
"Mr." Ayres expressed serious concerns about leaving Napa State Hospital for either a residential home or his home with his wife. He understood that the conservator would have with court approval the power to decide his residence."
Huh? If he doesn't want to go home to his wife or a residential home, then where does he want to go?
To view the documents related to the case, click on the little picture of a camera on the far right "Image" column. it will open as an acrobat file:
Case PRO122027 - CONSERVATORSHIP OF WILLIAM AYRES
Funny, the doctors at Napa State Hospital themselves haven't decided whether Ayres is mentally incompetent. But in her petition to be Conservator, Barbara Ayres is portraying him as a doddering old man.
ReplyDeleteAyres was perfectly fine back in August, when he was hanging out in that San Francisco restaurant, eating and drinking alcohol with no assistance; holding court with his pals about the Iowa Straw Polls and his past business ventures.
What kind of scam is the dysfunctional Ayres family trying to pull off now?
Does this mean that the San Mateo Police Department can now bring up those VERY interesting letters from Barbara Ayres to her father that they found during their search of Ayres' home?
ReplyDeleteMcDougall's pretending that Ayres isn't under a criminal indictment. It's not up to Barbara Ayres where Ayres ends up. That's in the form she had to sign. It's up to Judge Grandsaert where Ayres goes.
ReplyDeleteIt WILL very likely be up to Barbara to decide where ayres ends up.
DeleteMy money says the judge will take this opportunity to extricate the court of San Molesteo from any further involvement in the matter.
They can't afford judicial review of all of the cases where young boys were sent to or released from lockup based on the word of ayres, their long-time, low-bid, molestation provider.
The address Barbara Ayres listed 3104 O Street, Sacramento is just a FedEx/Mail Box location. Just a cheap rental in town I am sure it is not even her real address. Doesn't she live on the East Coast? Another smoke and mirror tactic, yes my daughter lives nearby?
ReplyDeleteI'd like to try to keep specific addresses out of the post, please, even though they are listed in the publicly available documents. The address you mention is indeed a company: a "mailbox store", where one can rent mail drops.
Deleteayres' daughter does not live on the east coast: she lives in Sacramento, and has for awhile, including during the time that the criminal trial was underway.
To the best of our knowledge she did not attend any of the trial or hearings, and we were there for most of the hearings and days of trial. In fact, at one point ayres' attorney introduced Solveig and Robert (who lives in Chicago, but attended the trial) but noted that his daughter was not, or "could not" be present.
Ok, taking bets. Does Ayres not want to go back with Solveig because he is relieved not to have hide the fact that he is a perv from her ? (Although the fact that Ayres rhapsodized over lunch in August with his wife and medical colleagues about "boys mooning out car windows" shows he hasn't done a good job covering his perviness.)
ReplyDeleteOr is Solveig just worn out from the stress of covering for and enabling a pedophile?
Oh, come on. You can't shame the shameless.
Delete